Investigating the Interactiveness of IELTS Academic Writing Tasks and Their Washback on EFL Teachers' Test Preparation Practices
Author | : Parisa Safaei |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 0 |
Release | : 2023 |
ISBN-10 | : OCLC:1409133980 |
ISBN-13 | : |
Rating | : 4/5 (80 Downloads) |
Book excerpt: This study investigated the interactiveness of IELTS academic writing tasks and their washback on EFL teachers' test preparation practices. Adopting a convergent parallel mixed-methods research design, this study looked into the reality of academic writing in real-life contexts and examined the degree of consistency between the test, target language use requirements, and test preparation content. It further examined the teacher factor to explore the direction and intensity of IELTS washback effect on teachers' choice of materials, class activities, and teaching methodology in their test preparation courses. Eighteen teachers and 143 students from IELTS preparation courses in four language schools participated in this study. Qualitative data collection for this study involved an analysis of task characteristics conducted on sample IELTS academic writing tasks, representative academic writing tasks in the target context of use, and classroom tasks; classroom observations, and focus-group teacher interviews. Quantitative data collection included data from two teacher questionnaires and two student questionnaires. Data was analyzed in two phases and triangulated in order to respond to the research questions. Overall, it was seen that despite shared features between IELTS writing and real-life academic writing, there are major divergences between Target Language Use (TLU) and test tasks. It was argued that given the extensive scope of test-taker demographic and wide applicability of IELTS, adequate engagement of all TLU features would pose a practicality challenge for the design of IELTS. Findings pointed to prominent differences between IELTS and university writing at various levels as far as interactiveness was concerned, such as the degree of intended metacognitive engagement via task interdependence, affective engagement, and strategy use. With regards to washback, the interpretation linked some test design features to the teachers' exam preparation practices, highlighting the narrowing of the curriculum due to the pressures imposed by the exam, as well as beneficial outcomes of IELTS exam preparation on the teachers' behavior, which would ultimately benefit the learners. Factors such as teachers' opinions of the exam, their teaching philosophy, pressures from administration and student expectations, among others, caused washback variability, influencing the intensity and direction of exam effects on teaching practices. The implications of the study include the importance of research evidence and assessment literacy in shaping realistic expectations and fair practices in standardized language tests, particularly for admitting international students to universities. The study suggests adopting a comprehensive framework of academic literacy and considering multiple criteria, such as interviews, personal statements, and writing samples, for assessing applicants. It also highlights the need for assessment literacy among teachers and other stakeholders to understand the limitations and impacts of high-stakes exams. The implications further explore the potential for professional development opportunities, collaborative learning communities, and access to high-quality resources to enhance language assessment literacy. The findings also emphasize the role of teachers in guiding students and influencing the positive and negative effects of high-stakes exams.